How to deal with corrigenda to TGs
How should small errors that are being found TG docs (e.g. in some Annex I TGs, the URIs for identifying the specifications still contain a rc1-version number) be handled?
- Should new versions of the documents (with a bug fix version number, e.g. version 3.1.1) be published, or
- Should such corrigenda should be collected and published on a web site and linked to from the TG document with a statement such as "known corrigenda can be found at this link"
#1 Updated by Michael Lutz about 6 years ago
Option 2 would be much easier to implement and it would be clearer to the reader what exactly has changed from one version to the next (without having to publish a detailed change log).
In addition, the collected corrigenda could be checked at regular intervals (once every 6 months or 1 year) to see if they would warrant a new version of the document.