Agenda Suggestions for Malmoe-meeting
|Status:||Closed||Start date:||17 Aug 2015|
|Assignee:||Michael Östling||% Done:|
Below are suggestions for Agenda for the two-day Meeting in Malmoe Sept 1st and 2nd.
Please comment on these and add suggestions for additional topics to handle.
Feedback from from MIG-t on draft issues
The feedback will guide us for possible changes in draft.
Management of comments on draft 0.4
Most commets should be handled before meeting. But open issues will be discussed.
Structure of document.
We have now integrated some elements from SDS and described them in same section as they are decribed for other types of resourses.
Examples of this are elements Resource contacts and Resource Locator. For other elements we keep information in separate section like
metadata for Interoperability and Theme Specific metadata. Are these principles ok? Do we need some changes here ?
Rework of requirements
The current requirements are a mixture of requirements from Implementing rules, ISO19115 as well as general interoperability claims.
There is a strong need from validation group (MIWP-5) that these requirements are better structured to aid generation of a clear validation framework
The next steps for the Technical guidelines metadata
In the workplan there are a number of additional issues to be solved during Autumn.
Besides these are also strategic desicions on If we should and if so then when to write also technical guidelines for
ISO 19115-1 and GeoDcat-AP
#3 Updated by Marc Leobet about 5 years ago
In addition, it is often a source of misunderstood to call "requirement" what is in fact a "recommandation". Could we drop the first word which would have to be used only for regulation'srequirement, and use the second? In that case, what is under "recommandation" flag could get a "good pratice" one.