Consultation #2610

Comments on proposals for SDS TG and discussion paper - before submission to MIG-P

Added by Michael Lutz about 5 years ago. Updated almost 5 years ago.

Status:ClosedStart date:16 Nov 2015
Priority:NormalDue date:29 Nov 2015
Assignee:Michael Lutz
Category:-

Description

Please find attached proposals for

The discussion paper has been drafted by a small ad-hoc group of MIG-T members. The proposed TG update has been drafted by JRC incorporating the clarifications from the discussion paper and the proposed modifications for handling SDS metadata without requiring an extension to ISO 19115/19119/19139 (as proposed by the MIWP-8 sub-group). The proposed TG update also aims at making the mapping from requirements in the IRs to requirements in the TGs cleaner and more explicit.

According to the MIG workflow (see below), the proposal from the ad-hoc group and MIWP-8 should now be discussed by MIG-T before being proposed to MIG-P for endorsement. To facilitate the discussion (at the upcoming MIG-T meeting in Rome), please upload your comments on the proposal using the attached commenting tables (one per country, please) by 29 November as comments to this issue.

TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc1.pdf (1.85 MB) Michael Lutz, 16 Nov 2015 09:05 am

Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1.pdf (800 KB) Michael Lutz, 16 Nov 2015 09:05 am

Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1_comments_XX.docx (22.5 KB) Michael Lutz, 16 Nov 2015 09:05 am

TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc1_comments_XX.docx (22.5 KB) Michael Lutz, 16 Nov 2015 09:05 am

TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc1_comments_FR-1.docx - French comments on SDS TG (24.8 KB) Marie Lambois, 25 Nov 2015 11:36 am

Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1_comments_FR-1.docx - French comments on discussion paper SDS (25.7 KB) Marie Lambois, 25 Nov 2015 11:36 am

Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1_comments_DK.docx (26.8 KB) Lars Storgaard, 27 Nov 2015 11:35 am

Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1_comments_DE.docx (23 KB) Michael Lutz, 27 Nov 2015 05:19 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc1_comments_DE.docx (25.7 KB) Michael Lutz, 27 Nov 2015 05:19 pm

Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1_comments_CZ.docx (26.7 KB) Lenka Rejentova, 29 Nov 2015 04:04 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc1_comments_CZ.docx (27.5 KB) Lenka Rejentova, 29 Nov 2015 04:04 pm

Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1_comments_IT.docx (25.5 KB) Carlo Cipolloni, 29 Nov 2015 10:25 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc1_comments_IT.docx (26.2 KB) Carlo Cipolloni, 29 Nov 2015 10:25 pm

Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1_comments_PL.docx (22.1 KB) Michael Lutz, 30 Nov 2015 01:42 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc1_comments_PL.docx (24 KB) Michael Lutz, 30 Nov 2015 01:42 pm

Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1 0rc1_comments_NL.docx (24.3 KB) Michael Lutz, 30 Nov 2015 01:45 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc1_comments_PP.docx (24.9 KB) Alex Ramage, 01 Dec 2015 04:36 pm

Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1_comments_PP.docx (24.4 KB) Alex Ramage, 01 Dec 2015 04:36 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc1_comments_all.docx (33.7 KB) Michael Lutz, 11 Dec 2015 11:01 am

Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1_comments_all.docx (33.4 KB) Michael Lutz, 11 Dec 2015 11:01 am

Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1_comments_all_resolutions.docx (36.8 KB) Michael Lutz, 28 Jan 2016 08:57 am

TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc1_comments_all_resolutions.docx (37.6 KB) Michael Lutz, 28 Jan 2016 08:57 am

TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc2.docx (467 KB) Michael Lutz, 12 Feb 2016 07:08 pm

Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1_comments_all_resolutions.docx (35.4 KB) Michael Lutz, 12 Feb 2016 07:08 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc1_comments_all_resolutions.docx (37.6 KB) Michael Lutz, 12 Feb 2016 07:08 pm

History

#1 Updated by Michael Lutz about 5 years ago

Dear all,

I think it would be good to have feedback from all MIG-T representatives on this - even if you do not have any comments.

So please use the following form to provide your response on the proposals.

Thanks, Michael

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Country: 

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

Please provide a justification in case you do not agree with submitting the proposals to MIG-P:

 

#2 Updated by Marie Lambois about 5 years ago

Country: France

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

Please provide a justification in case you do not agree with submitting the proposals to MIG-P:

#3 Updated by Michael Lutz about 5 years ago

Country: MALTA

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#4 Updated by Michael Lutz about 5 years ago

Dear all,

please remember to provide your feedback on the proposed SDS discussion paper and TG update - even if you do not have any comments - by 29 November.

So far, we only had responses from France and Malta.

Thanks, Michael

#5 Updated by Lars Storgaard about 5 years ago

Country: Denmark

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#6 Updated by Simona Bunea about 5 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Michael Lutz to Simona Bunea

Country: Romania

[x] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#7 Updated by Michael Lutz about 5 years ago

Country: Bulgaria

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#8 Updated by Michael Lutz about 5 years ago

Country: SPAIN

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#9 Updated by Michael Lutz about 5 years ago

Country: Austria

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

Please provide a justification in case you do not agree with submitting the proposals to MIG-P: - 

#10 Updated by Henrique Silva about 5 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Simona Bunea to Henrique Silva

Country: Portugal

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#11 Updated by Michael Lutz about 5 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Henrique Silva to Michael Lutz

Country: Germany

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#13 Updated by Michael Lutz about 5 years ago

Country: NORWAY

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#14 Updated by Christina Wasström about 5 years ago

 

Country: Sweden

[XWe agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#15 Updated by Lenka Rejentova about 5 years ago

Country: Czech Republic

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#16 Updated by Lenka Rejentova about 5 years ago

  • File Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1_comments_CZ.docx added
  • File TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc1_comments_CZ.docx added

#17 Updated by Lenka Rejentova about 5 years ago

  • File deleted (TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc1_comments_CZ.docx)

#18 Updated by Lenka Rejentova about 5 years ago

  • File deleted (Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1_comments_CZ.docx)

#19 Updated by Carlo Cipolloni about 5 years ago

Country: ITALY

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

 

#20 Updated by Jari Reini about 5 years ago

Country: Finland

[XWe agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#21 Updated by Tamás Palya about 5 years ago

Country: Hungary

[XWe agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#22 Updated by Martin Tuchyna about 5 years ago

Country: Slovakia

[XWe agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#23 Updated by Sulev Õitspuu about 5 years ago

Country: Estonia

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#24 Updated by Michael Lutz about 5 years ago

Country: Poland

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#25 Updated by Michael Lutz about 5 years ago

Country: The Netherlands

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[XWe agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#26 Updated by Michael Lutz about 5 years ago

Country: SPAIN

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#27 Updated by Michael Lutz about 5 years ago

We've had 19 replies so far, all of them positive. See the summary below.

Country agree - no comments agree - with comments don't agree
AT x    
BG x    
CZ   x  
DE   x  
DK   x  
EE x    
ES x    
FI x    
FR   x  
HU x    
IS      
IT   x  
MT x    
NL   x  
NO x    
PL   x  
PT x    
RO x    
SE x    
SK x    
  12 7 0

#28 Updated by Alex Ramage about 5 years ago

Country: United Kingdom

Country: United Kingdom

[ We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below &comments in the attached tables).

#29 Updated by Michael Lutz about 5 years ago

Country: Latvia

[ X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

#30 Updated by Michael Lutz almost 5 years ago

The final outcome is 21 replies, all of them positive. See the summary below.

The collated comments received on both documents are attached.

Country agree agree - with comments don't agree
AT x    
BG x    
CZ   x  
DE   x  
DK   x  
EE x    
ES x    
FI x    
FR   x  
HU x    
IS      
IT   x  
LT x    
MT x    
NL   x  
NO x    
PL   x  
PT x    
RO x    
SE x    
SK x    
UK   x  
  13 8 0

#31 Updated by Michael Lutz almost 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Work in progress to Closed

#32 Updated by Michael Lutz almost 5 years ago

There has actually been another reply from Latvia (on 29 November) that I missed (sorry!).

-------------------

Country: Latvia

[ X] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, without comments.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement, with comments (see attached tables).

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed documents to MIG-P for review and endorsement (see justification below & comments in the attached tables).

Please provide a justification in case you do not agree with submitting the proposals to MIG-P:

-------------------

So the final number of responses is 22, 14 agree and 8 agree with comments.

#33 Updated by Michael Lutz almost 5 years ago

Please find the proposed resolutions for the SDS discussion paper and TG attached (Discussion_Paper_INSPIRE_SDS_v1.0rc1_comments_all_resolutions.docx and TG_for_INSPIRE_SDS_3.2rc1_comments_all_resolutions.docx).

I will update the TG document accordingly next week.

The proposal from the ad-hoc SDS group is to integrate all content from the discussion paper into the TG and not to publish a final version 1.0 of the SDS discussion paper, in order to avoid confusion and possible inconsistencies and to reduce the effort for maintenance (one rather than 2 documents).

#34 Updated by Michael Lutz almost 5 years ago

The updated TG document and final comment resolution tables are attached. The document will now be submitted to MIG-P for consultation.

Also available in: Atom PDF