Consultation #2738

Draft TG for WCS-based download services

Added by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago. Updated about 3 years ago.

Status:ClosedStart date:23 Mar 2016
Priority:NormalDue date:29 Apr 2016
Assignee:Michael Lutz
Category:-

Description

Please find attached v1.0 release candidate 1 (rc1) of a new Technical Guidance document for download services based on the OGC Web Coverage Service (WCS) 2.0 standard.

The document has been developed by the MIG sub-group MIWP-7b (#2440), with support from a contractor (James Passmore, BGS). It includes:

  • a mapping from the IR requirements for download service to the operations and parameters supported by the WCS 2.0 standard (section 4.1)
  • detailed guidelines for "pre-defined dataset" download services (the operations required for all download services) (section 5)
  • detailed guidelines for "direct access" download sevices (section 6)
  • detailed guidelines for quality of service requirements (section 7)

As previously discussed, the document has been drafted as a stand-alone TG document complementing the current TG document for download services (that could be split up in separate documents in a similar fashion in the future).

We ask you to review and provide feedback on the proposed TG as a comment to this issue by Friday, 29 April 2016.

Please  select one of the following options:

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

Please provide your comments (if any) using the attached commenting table (TG_for_WCS-based_download_services_v1.0rc1_comments_XX.docx).

TG_for_WCS-based_download_services_v1.0rc1_comments_XX.docx (22.3 KB) Michael Lutz, 23 Mar 2016 05:51 pm

TechnicalGuidance_Download_Services_WCS_v1.0rc1.docx (1.42 MB) Michael Lutz, 23 Mar 2016 06:05 pm

TechnicalGuidance_Download_Services_WCS_v1.0rc1.pdf (1.76 MB) Michael Lutz, 23 Mar 2016 06:05 pm

TG_for_WCS-based_download_services_v1 0rc1_comments_uk.docx (35.2 KB) Alex Ramage, 14 Apr 2016 03:42 pm

TG_for_WCS-based_download_services_v1.0rc1_comments_CZ.docx (23.1 KB) Lenka Rejentova, 14 Apr 2016 06:08 pm

TG_for_WCS-based_download_services_v1.0rc1_comments_DE.docx (51.8 KB) Daniela Hogrebe, 28 Apr 2016 05:18 pm

TG_for_WCS-based_download_services_v1.0rc1_comments_FRANCE.docx (8.83 KB) Marie Lambois, 29 Apr 2016 03:50 pm

TG_for_WCS-based_download_services_v1.0rc1_comments_NL.docx (27.1 KB) Michel Grothe, 29 Apr 2016 07:28 pm

TG_for_WCS-based_download_services_v1.0rc1_comments_JRC.docx (33.3 KB) Michael Lutz, 02 May 2016 10:18 am

TG_for_WCS-based_download_services_v1.0rc1_comments_CH.docx (22.8 KB) Michael Lutz, 14 Jun 2016 04:44 pm

TG_for_WCS-based_download_services_v1.0rc1_comments_all.docx (68.6 KB) Michael Lutz, 14 Jun 2016 04:44 pm

TechnicalGuidance_Download_Services_WCS_v1.0rc2.docx (1.44 MB) Michael Lutz, 24 Oct 2016 11:07 am

TechnicalGuidance_Download_Services_WCS_v1.0rc2.pdf (1.57 MB) Michael Lutz, 24 Oct 2016 11:07 am

History

#1 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

Dear MIG-T colleagues,

this is a call for comments and MIG-T endorsement on the v1.0 release candidate 1 (rc1) of the new Technical Guidance document for download services based on the OGC Web Coverage Service (WCS) 2.0 standard.

We ask you to review and provide feedback on the proposed TG as a comment to this issue by Friday, 15 April 2016.

An overview of the document will be presented in the MIG-T meeting on 31 March.

Looking forward to your comments.

Best regards,

Michael (on behalf of the MIWP-7b sub-group)

#2 Updated by Christina Wasström over 3 years ago

From Sweden:

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#3 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

From Bulgaria:

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

 

#4 Updated by Daniela Hogrebe over 3 years ago

Dear Michael,

would it be possible to extend the deadline until end of April? Some of our national experts indicate that they need more time for reviewing the document.

Best regards,

Daniela

#5 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Due date changed from 15 Apr 2016 to 29 Apr 2016

Daniela, all,

yes, we can extend the deadline by 2 weeks to 29 April.

Best regards,

Michael

#6 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

Country: Malta

[x] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#7 Updated by Alex Ramage over 3 years ago

Country UK

 

We ask you to review and provide feedback on the proposed TG as a comment to this issue by Friday, 29 April 2016.

Please  select one of the following options:

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

Regards

Alex Ramage

#8 Updated by Lenka Rejentova over 3 years ago

Czech Republic:

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[x] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#9 Updated by Arvids Ozols over 3 years ago

Latvia:

[X ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#10 Updated by Sulev Õitspuu over 3 years ago

Estonia:

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#11 Updated by Daniela Hogrebe over 3 years ago

Germany:

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#12 Updated by Lars Storgaard over 3 years ago

From Denmark:

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#13 Updated by Marie Lambois over 3 years ago

France:

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#14 Updated by Ouns Kissiyar over 3 years ago

Belgium : 

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#15 Updated by Tamás Palya over 3 years ago

Hungary: 

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#16 Updated by Jari Reini over 3 years ago

Finland

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#17 Updated by Michel Grothe over 3 years ago

The Netherlands:

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#18 Updated by Carlo Cipolloni over 3 years ago

From ITALY:

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#19 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

From JRC:

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#20 Updated by Ewa Surma over 3 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

Poland

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#21 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

Brought back the issue description (which Ewa accidentially deleted).

#22 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

From Norway:

[x] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement

#23 Updated by Simona Bunea over 3 years ago

Romania:

[x] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments

[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#24 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

  • File TG_for_WCS-based_download_services_v1.0rc1_comments_all.docx added

Please see below a summary table of the feedback received. The combined comments are attached.

Country Agreed Agreed with comments Not agreed
BE x    
BG x    
CZ   x  
DE   x  
DK x    
EE x    
FI x    
FR   x  
HU x    
IT x    
LV x    
MT x    
NL   x  
NO x    
PL x    
RO x    
SE x    
UK   x  
(JRC)   x  
Total 13 5 (+JRC) 0

 

#25 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

The following feedback from Switzerland got lost:

Switzerland

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

Kind regards,

Christine Najar

 

Thus, the summary table changes as follows. The Swiss and the updated combined comments are attached.

Country Agreed Agreed with comments Not agreed
BE x    
BG x    
CH   x  
CZ   x  
DE   x  
DK x    
EE x    
FI x    
FR   x  
HU x    
IT x    
LV x    
MT x    
NL   x  
NO x    
PL x    
RO x    
SE x    
UK   x  
(JRC)   x  
Total 13 6 (+JRC) 0
 

#26 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

  • File deleted (TG_for_WCS-based_download_services_v1.0rc1_comments_all.docx)

#27 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Work in progress to Closed

This MIG-T consultation has been completed.

#28 Updated by Michael Lutz about 3 years ago

Please find the updated draft (v1.0 release candidate 2) attached (as Word and PDF files). These will now be submitted to MIG-T for a final review and endorsement.

Also available in: Atom PDF