Consultation #2753

Updated TG for Metadata (v2.0rc2)

Added by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago. Updated about 3 years ago.

Status:ClosedStart date:08 Apr 2016
Priority:NormalDue date:09 May 2016
Assignee:Michael Lutz
Category:-

Description

Please find attached v2.0 release candidate 2 (rc2) of the updated Technical Guidance document for metadata.

The document has been developed by the MIG sub-group MIWP-8 (#2130), with support from a technical editor (Ilkka Rinne, Spatineo). It includes guidance for the requirements for spatial data sets and services from the IRs for metadata (Regulation 1205/2008) and IRs for interoperability of spatial data sets and services (Regulation 1089/2010 incl. its amendments) and is structured into the following requirements classes:

  • Data sets and data set series
    • Baseline metadata for data sets and data set series
    • Interoperability metadata for data sets and data set
  • Spatial Data Services 
    • Baseline metadata for Spatial Data Services
    • Metadata for INSPIRE Network Services
    • Metadata for Invocable Spatial Data Services
    • Metadata for Interoperable Spatial Data Services
    • Metadata for Harmonised Spatial Data Services

We ask you to review and provide feedback on the proposed TG as a comment to this issue by Monday, 9 May 2016.

Please  select one of the following options:

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

Please provide your comments (if any) using the attached commenting table (TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2.0rc2_comments_XX.docx).

TG_Metadata_v2.0rc2.pdf (1.64 MB) Michael Lutz, 08 Apr 2016 12:29 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2.0rc2_comments_XX.docx (25.6 KB) Michael Lutz, 08 Apr 2016 12:40 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2.0rc2_comments_DE.docx - Comments from Germany (36.3 KB) Daniela Hogrebe, 03 May 2016 04:33 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2 0rc2_comments_SE.docx (31.1 KB) Christina Wasström, 04 May 2016 01:08 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2.0rc2_comments_CZ.docx (31.4 KB) Lenka Rejentova, 09 May 2016 06:58 am

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2.0rc2_comments_DK.docx (38.5 KB) Lars Storgaard, 09 May 2016 12:06 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2.0rc2_comments_UK.docx (23.2 KB) Alex Ramage, 09 May 2016 03:14 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2.0rc2_comments_FR.docx (30.2 KB) Marie Lambois, 10 May 2016 12:16 am

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2.0rc2_comments_IT.docx (25.9 KB) Carlo Cipolloni, 10 May 2016 12:32 am

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2 0rc2_comments_CH.docx (25.8 KB) Christine Najar, 10 May 2016 10:09 am

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2.0rc2_comments_NL.docx (47.5 KB) Michel Grothe, 11 May 2016 11:03 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2 0rc2_comments_AT.docx (17.5 KB) Michael Lutz, 23 May 2016 02:40 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2.0rc2_comments_ES.docx (52.5 KB) Michael Lutz, 24 May 2016 12:01 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2.0rc2_comments_ALL.pdf (1.03 MB) Michael Lutz, 27 May 2016 03:46 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2 0rc2_comments_NON-EDITORIAL_resolutions_DK_response.docx (105 KB) Lars Storgaard, 05 Jul 2016 01:45 pm

TG_Metadata_v2.0rc4.docx (1.15 MB) Michael Lutz, 05 Nov 2016 03:43 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2.0rc2_comments_EDITORIAL_resolutions.docx (111 KB) Michael Lutz, 05 Nov 2016 03:43 pm

TG_for_INSPIRE_MD_v2.0rc2_comments_NON-EDITORIAL_resolutions.docx (110 KB) Michael Lutz, 05 Nov 2016 03:43 pm

TG_Metadata_v2.0rc4.pdf (3.03 MB) Michael Lutz, 05 Nov 2016 03:43 pm

History

#1 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

Dear MIG-T colleagues,

this is a call for comments and MIG-T endorsement on the v2.0 release candidate 2 (rc2) of the new Technical Guidance document for metadata.

We ask you to review and provide feedback on the proposed TG as a comment to this issue by Monday, 9 May 2016.

Looking forward to your comments.

Best regards,

Michael (on behalf of the MIWP-8 sub-group)

#2 Updated by Daniela Hogrebe over 3 years ago

Germany:

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#3 Updated by Christina Wasström over 3 years ago

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#4 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

From Bulgaria:

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

Best regards,

Nikolay Ivanov Petrov

#5 Updated by Lenka Rejentova over 3 years ago

Czech Republic:

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#6 Updated by Lars Storgaard over 3 years ago

Denmark:

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#7 Updated by Alex Ramage over 3 years ago

Michael,

I note that James Reid (UK) has been left of the list of MIWP-08 workgroup members.

Alex Ramage

#8 Updated by Alex Ramage over 3 years ago

UK:

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#9 Updated by Marie Lambois over 3 years ago

France :

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#10 Updated by Carlo Cipolloni over 3 years ago

Italy:

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#11 Updated by Arvid Lillethun over 3 years ago

Norway:

[ x] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#12 Updated by Jari Reini over 3 years ago

Finland:

[ x] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#13 Updated by Age Sild over 3 years ago

Estonia:

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#14 Updated by Tamás Palya over 3 years ago

Hungary:

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#15 Updated by Arvids Ozols over 3 years ago

Latvia

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#16 Updated by Christine Najar over 3 years ago

Switzerland

[We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#17 Updated by Ouns Kissiyar over 3 years ago

Belgium

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#18 Updated by Marcin Grudzien over 3 years ago

Comment

Poland

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#19 Updated by Michel Grothe over 3 years ago

The Netherlands

[We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#20 Updated by Henrique Silva over 3 years ago

Portugal

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

#21 Updated by Simona Bunea over 3 years ago

Romania

[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

 

#22 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

Dear Mr. Michael Lutz.,

Kindly find below Malta’s reply as requested by the MIWP-8 Sub group based on the feedback from the Maltese MIG-T members.

[x] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

Best Regards,

Kurt Bonnici

#23 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

Dear Michael, dear colleagues,

please find attached the Austrian consolidated comments for the updated TG for Metadata.

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[x] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

Best regards,

Markus Jobst

#24 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

Summary:

Country Agree Agree with comments Do not agree
AU   x  
BE x    
BG x    
CH   x  
CZ   x  
DE   x  
DK   x  
EE x    
ES   x  
FI x    
FR   x  
HU x    
IT   x  
LV x    
MT x    
NL   x  
NO x    
PL x    
PT x    
RO x    
SE   x  
UK   x  
Total 11 11 0

#25 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Work in progress to Closed

#26 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

Dear all,

Spanish position:

[ ] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement
[X] We agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement after taking in account the provided comments
[ ] We do not agree to submitting the proposed TG to the MIG-P for endorsement (as justified through in the provided comments)

Best regards,

Emilio López Romero

#27 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

Please find a table with the consolidated comments attached.

#28 Updated by Lars Storgaard over 3 years ago

Dear MIWP-8

Thank you for the resolutions to our comments. We have provided clarifications in the "NON-EDITORIAL"-part, see attached file.

Our clarifications is marked like this. Do not hesitate to ask for more input etc.

Br Lars

 

#29 Updated by Michael Lutz over 3 years ago

Thanks, Lars. Which version of the document were you commenting on? Some of the references in your comments suggest that you were looking at an earlier version (rc1?).

Best regards, Michael

#30 Updated by Lars Storgaard over 3 years ago

Yes, I was also a bit surprise to see that many of the requests for clarifications indicated that we had comment on a older version... But now I have checked and it is the one named "TG_MD_20rc2_draft_without_annexes_2016-03-13".

BR Lars

#31 Updated by Michael Lutz about 3 years ago

Dear all,

I'm pleased (not to say, relieved) to upload an updated version of the MD TG v2.0 (release candidate 4), which addresses (almost) all comments received during the MIG-T review.

There are still a few minor open issues in the document, that will need to be resolved during the MIG-P review. Also, there is still some final editing to be done, to ensure all references are correct etc.

The comments resolution tables including all resolutions are also attached (split in editorial and non-editorial issues).

The document will now go to MIG-P for a final review and (hopefully) endoresement in the December meeting.

Michael

Also available in: Atom PDF