NO: Thematic Viewer
|Status:||Feedback||Start date:||23 May 2018|
|Assignee:||Angelo Quaglia||% Done:|
|Submitting Organisation:||NO||Knowledge-Base relevant?:|
|Country:||NO - Norway||Keyword #2:|
|Originating UI:||Thematic Viewer||Keyword #3:|
Sent: 23 May 2018 10:32
To: QUAGLIA Angelo (JRC-ISPRA-EXT)
Subject: SV: thematic viewer
We have reported our metadata by the 15. May 2018. We had hoped that the Thematic viewer was working and that the results for Norway was to be correct according to the reporting. But we think there is some missing updating or some of the pages/ views.
For instance on the Nature and biodiversity. No data available. Is this correct. We thought we had delivered a series of such data.
Could you please inform if this is based on the new / avaliable CSW from Norway and thus the data that we also have reported by the 15 of May. We have made our report as an export from our metadata.
#1 Updated by Angelo Quaglia about 2 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Feedback
the latest harvesting was performed May 22 18:19.
The Resource Browser shows that it could find no metadata tagged with the agreed INSPIRE Priority dataset codelist ( http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/metadata-codelist/PriorityDataset ) keywords:
#3 Updated by Arvid Lillethun about 2 years ago
We see for instance that we have in the metadata the tac Inspire priority data set CDDA. See picture and http://inspire-geoportal.ec.europa.eu/resources/INSPIRE-ccf3ad04-9003-11e3-aef9-52540004b857_20180522-140439/services/1/PullResults/451-500/datasets/18/
We thought that this tag would qualify the data to also come into the priority data viewer:
Why does not this dataset come into the thematic viewer on nature/biodiversity, while it still is found in the thematic view? http://inspire-geoportal.ec.europa.eu/thematicviewer/Theme.action?themecode=ps
#4 Updated by Angelo Quaglia about 2 years ago
when the INSPIRE Geoportal manages to recognise the keyword as a valid Priority Dataset one, it will appear in the Reporting Tags section.
I will therefore need to check how you cited the keyword:
#5 Updated by Angelo Quaglia about 2 years ago
your using a wrong citation for the thesaurus:
The value "Nationally designated areas - CDDA" was not in the first version of the codelist.
That value was added to the second version.
Here are the correct values: