Support #3734

FI: Feedback and questions on the Indicators tool

Added by Kai Koistinen 11 months ago. Updated 11 months ago.

Status:FeedbackStart date:11 Nov 2019
Priority:NormalDue date:
Assignee:Vlado Cetl% Done:


Category:Harvesting Console
Target version:-
Submitting Organisation:NLSFI Knowledge-Base relevant?:No
Proactive:No Keyword #1:Indicators
Country:FI - Finland Keyword #2:
Originating UI: Keyword #3:


Dear Geoportal team,


As requested, I did some testing on the new INSPIRE monitoring & reporting Indicators tool. The Indicators page itself is very clear and straightforward. Here are some questions and comments regarding calculation of the indicator values:

1) From the documentation powerpoint: "INSPIRE Geoportal checks upon duplicates: if present they are counted as one."

  • What is the logic behind this? UUID check or some other logic?
  • If dataset has many themes is it counted only once? One the previous years it has been duplicated for all of it's themes.

2) Indicators based on the INSPIRE Reference Validator (MDi1.1 and MDi1.2).

  • Seeing these results would be important asap.
  • Is there some conformity tolerance like before (80% validity) or must the metadata pass validation 100%? 
  • Is there going to be a link in the Geoportal to Reference validator validation reports? At the moment there is some report link but it's not a Reference validator report.

3) DSi1.4 and DSi1.5 Regional and National

4) DSi2.x spatial data set conformity

  • Are the results based on the reported conformity on metadata or are you doing some validation to prove the conformity?

5) NSi4.x network service conformity

  • Are these results based on some validation or just metadata conformity statement?
  • If no validation is done, why our discovery service conformity is 0%?
  • Total number of services would be useful information to be shown on these indicator boxes (probably on some other indicators too)
  • I think we have 0 transformation services and NSi4.4 indicator is 0%. Should it be "null" or 100% instead when no services are available?


Best regards,

Kai Koistinen

NLS Finland


#1 Updated by Daniele Francioli 11 months ago

  • Status changed from New to Assigned
  • Assignee set to Vlado Cetl

#2 Updated by Vlado Cetl 11 months ago

Dear Kai, hope it is more clear after today's 2018.1 meeting. Please check ppts from MIG-T meeting and a s well #3737

#3 Updated by Daniele Francioli 11 months ago

  • Status changed from Assigned to Feedback

Also available in: Atom PDF