Support #3743

feedback monitoring 2020

Added by Erik Obersteiner 9 months ago. Updated 9 months ago.

Status:AssignedStart date:13 Nov 2019
Priority:NormalDue date:
Assignee:Davide Artasensi% Done:

0%

Category:Harvesting Console
Target version:-
Submitting Organisation:AT Knowledge-Base relevant?:No
Proactive:No Keyword #1:
Country:AT - Austria Keyword #2:
Originating UI: Keyword #3:

Description

Dear INSPIRE team,

we also see problems with DSi 1.4 and DSi 1.5; we have about 180 MD tagget with National and about 150 MD tagged with Regional an the Indicator says 0 in both cases. We use both options 1 and 2 (with and without anchor; e.g.:  http://geometadatensuche.inspire.gv.at/metadatensuche/srv/api/records/1ca1d6b3-e3f7-45d1-aa2b-a2a0d7499dc5/formatters/xml or http://geometadatensuche.inspire.gv.at/metadatensuche/srv/api/records/242932F6-9671-483C-95FC-35EDE78B9DD6/formatters/xml).

The second problem seems to be the calculation of DSi2.1, DSi2.2 and DSi2.3. Contrary to the practice of the last years the indicator seems to be calculated as percentage of ALL Datasets instead of a percentage of the DATASETS OF THE RESPECTIVE ANNEX, so DSi2.1, DSi2.2 and DSi2.3 sum up to DSi 2 instead of being a weighted mean.

Both problems have already been addressed by Ine de Visser (https://ies-svn.jrc.ec.europa.eu/issues/3737).

Best regards Erik

History

#1 Updated by Davide Artasensi 9 months ago

  • Status changed from New to Assigned
  • Assignee set to Davide Artasensi

#2 Updated by Davide Artasensi 9 months ago

  • Status changed from Assigned to Feedback

Dear Erik,

about the first question:

we also see problems with DSi 1.4 and DSi 1.5; we have about 180 MD tagget with National and about 150 MD tagged with Regional an the Indicator says 0 in both cases.

We already solved a bug on the identification for these indicators. Please, have a look at my replies here: https://ies-svn.jrc.ec.europa.eu/issues/3735#note-5

about the second question:

The second problem seems to be the calculation of DSi2.1, DSi2.2 and DSi2.3. Contrary to the practice of the last years the indicator seems to be calculated as percentage of ALL Datasets instead of a percentage of the DATASETS OF THE RESPECTIVE ANNEX, so DSi2.1, DSi2.2 and DSi2.3 sum up to DSi 2 instead of being a weighted mean.

Both problems have already been addressed by Ine de Visser (https://ies-svn.jrc.ec.europa.eu/issues/3737).

please, have a look at my reply: https://ies-svn.jrc.ec.europa.eu/issues/3737#note-2

Any feedback is appreciated.

 

Kind regards,

Davide

#4 Updated by Davide Artasensi 9 months ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Assigned

Also available in: Atom PDF