Activity
From 24 Dec 2015 to 22 Jan 2016
21 Jan 2016
-
10:10 am Discussion #2661: [Register Federation] Registration process
New working draft of the registry file, including direct download URLs of the registers' files ( attachment:regis...
20 Jan 2016
-
04:56 pm Discussion #2662: Feedback on MIWP-6 meeting at the 18/01/2016
Done .. I closed the issue
-
-
04:22 pm Discussion #2662: Feedback on MIWP-6 meeting at the 18/01/2016
Moved the issue into MIWP-6 project. Note that in #2661 Daniele already started a discussion on the registration proc...
-
Dear colleagues,
Thank you very much for all your work. It is clearly a big step forward. Still, during ...
-
Dear colleagues,
Thank you very much for all your work. It is clearly a big step forward. Still, during ...
-
As a follow-up from the discussion on Monday, please find some further details on the proposed registration process i...
19 Jan 2016
-
A working draft for the registry exchange file is attached to this page ( attachment:registry.rdf ).
This file is a ...-
05:14 pm Discussion #2661 (Assigned): [Register Federation] Registration process
This discussion describes the registration process needed to insert a registry in the RoR.
Background
We decide...
18 Jan 2016
-
09:42 am Discussion #2615: [Register Federation] Fields for the Register exchange format
Michael Lutz wrote:
Another issue I would like to raise: Do we need to repeat any statements about the concepts th...
Also available in: Atom