Activity
From 30 Dec 2015 to 28 Jan 2016
28 Jan 2016
-
04:52 pm Discussion #2661: [Register Federation] Registration process
Maybe I should add as it might become misunderstood:
The rdf/skos representation of a register (including meta inf...
-
04:01 pm Discussion #2661: [Register Federation] Registration process
Dear Daniele,
Thank you for your reply on our feedback which helps us to better understand your point of view. I w...
-
09:18 am Support #2672 (Resolved): [Registry service support] Questions related to the URI case (codelists...
I think the error you have had may be related to the fact that you are using "codeList" rather than "c...
-
09:16 am Support #2672 (Resolved): [Registry service support] Questions related to the URI case (codelists...
For our inspire application we use the codelists of ' naturalResources' and 'prospectingAndMiningArea'...
25 Jan 2016
-
09:25 am Discussion #2661: [Register Federation] Registration process
I've added some example files:
Registry exchange file for the central INSPIRE registry (inspire_Registry_ex...
-
09:21 am Discussion #2661: [Register Federation] Registration process
Thank you for your feedback, we are always trying to follow the outcome of the discussion during the web meeting and ...
21 Jan 2016
-
10:10 am Discussion #2661: [Register Federation] Registration process
New working draft of the registry file, including direct download URLs of the registers' files ( attachment:regis...
20 Jan 2016
-
04:56 pm Discussion #2662: Feedback on MIWP-6 meeting at the 18/01/2016
Done .. I closed the issue
-
04:56 pm Discussion #2662 (Closed): Feedback on MIWP-6 meeting at the 18/01/2016
-
04:22 pm Discussion #2662: Feedback on MIWP-6 meeting at the 18/01/2016
Moved the issue into MIWP-6 project. Note that in #2661 Daniele already started a discussion on the registration proc...
-
04:02 pm Discussion #2662 (Closed): Feedback on MIWP-6 meeting at the 18/01/2016
Dear colleagues,
Thank you very much for all your work. It is clearly a big step forward. Still, during ...
-
04:55 pm Discussion #2661: [Register Federation] Registration process
Dear colleagues,
Thank you very much for all your work. It is clearly a big step forward. Still, during ...
-
04:25 pm Discussion #2661: [Register Federation] Registration process
As a follow-up from the discussion on Monday, please find some further details on the proposed registration process i...
19 Jan 2016
-
09:07 pm Discussion #2661: [Register Federation] Registration process
A working draft for the registry exchange file is attached to this page ( attachment:registry.rdf ).
This file is a ...-
05:14 pm Discussion #2661 (Assigned): [Register Federation] Registration process
This discussion describes the registration process needed to insert a registry in the RoR.
Background
We decide...
18 Jan 2016
-
09:42 am Discussion #2615: [Register Federation] Fields for the Register exchange format
Michael Lutz wrote:
Another issue I would like to raise: Do we need to repeat any statements about the concepts th...
Also available in: Atom