Activity

From 09 Feb 2015 to 10 Mar 2015

10 Mar 2015

11:48 am Task #2214: MIWP-8 (D) Integrate metadata for interoperability into the Metadata TG.

As discussed before I finished the Excel sheet and considered the mandatory and conditional elements of ISO 19115 onl...

Peter Kochmann
11:39 am Task #2215: MIWP-8 (E-1) Integrate Theme specific metadata

As announced above I finished the Excel sheet and considered the mandatory and conditional elements of ISO 19115 only...

Peter Kochmann
11:01 am Task #2215: MIWP-8 (E-1) Integrate Theme specific metadata

Peter Kochmann schrieb:

Otherwise I propose to consider the mandatory and optional ones only and of course the one...

Peter Kochmann

08 Mar 2015

05:27 pm Task #2304: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Category

This is just for the discussion. The IR demands us to use a specific element for Category.
If not that have been so ...

Michael Östling

05 Mar 2015

02:06 pm Task #2221: MIWP-8 (M) Coupled resource

I've read carefully the mail from Michel and I thought about the issue again. My proposal from post#41 covers the...

Pawel Soczewski
01:03 pm Task #2215: MIWP-8 (E-1) Integrate Theme specific metadata

The revised table considering lineage for the descriptive results of data quality elements is still in progress. Sorr...

Peter Kochmann
11:41 am Task #2212: MIWP-8 (A) Conditions applying to access and use

I think consensus is unreachable on this topic : we have understood that fields under different way and it is too lat...

Marc Leobet
10:51 am Task #2212: MIWP-8 (A) Conditions applying to access and use

As far as I understood ISO 19115, there's no difference in expressing useLimitation via MD_Constraints (alone) or...

Peter Kochmann
10:05 am Task #2212: MIWP-8 (A) Conditions applying to access and use

I strongly support the Ine's proposal: "A codelist with language neutral codes should be helpfull to ha...

Marc Leobet
11:02 am Task #2305: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Resource locator

In the current TG MD a resource locator coulb be "- a link to a web with further instructions" It's not...

Ine de Visser
10:56 am Task #2309: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Point of contact

Yes the Custodian vs Distributor is relevant in UK too - we explicitly draw a disticntion as not all data producers h...

James Reid
08:26 am Task #2309: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Point of contact

I agree on that using the resourcecontact with role custodian is the simplest solution, maybe also most correct.
I w...

Michael Östling
10:03 am Task #2219: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS

@ Geraldine,

What do you think is the best solution possible with the fact that the commision regulation on SDS is...

Ine de Visser
09:32 am Task #2306: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Specification

I can't follow your comment, please explain what you mean with

"The suggested implementation for SDS Spec...

Ine de Visser

04 Mar 2015

09:09 pm Task #2306: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Specification

I don't feel fully comfortable with this implementation. 
Maybe I need to get some clarifications on t...

Michael Östling
07:59 pm Task #2304: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Category

I would interpret the distinction between a Spatial Data service and Network services as Ine describes above.

...

Michael Östling
06:37 pm Task #2219: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS

I was out for months (maternity leave), so this comment is not on time. But I really think it is a shame that it is f...

Geraldine Nolf
04:10 pm Task #2221: MIWP-8 (M) Coupled resource

For your information:

In the branch of our GeoNetwork node (Flanders - Belgium) we use too both uuidref (to the re...

Geraldine Nolf
03:30 pm Task #2212: MIWP-8 (A) Conditions applying to access and use

we use MD_Constraints/gmd:useLimitation to fullfil 2.9.2. A codelist with language neutral codes should be helpfull&n...

Ine de Visser

03 Mar 2015

04:14 pm Task #2304: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Category

Sorry it takes my more time to understand where you refer to;

In the metadata regulation there are no network serv...

Ine de Visser
03:29 pm Task #2304: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Category

In metadata regulation (1205/2008) as I see it, spatial data service type is a wider classification.

There is not ...

Age Sild
02:51 pm Task #2304: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Category

In my opinion, if a service is not a INSPIRE network service it's also not a view service because thats an INSPIR...

Ine de Visser

02 Mar 2015

01:38 pm Task #2304: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Category

OK. We can distinguish INSPIRE Network services and Spatial Data Services (SDS). Regulation 1312/2014 is about Spatia...

Age Sild

25 Feb 2015

05:22 pm Task #2310: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Contains operation

In our metadata profile we considered the mandatory elements operationName, DCP and connectPoint only. We never misse...

Peter Kochmann
04:55 pm Task #2308: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Quality of service

I think Ine's proposal to take DataQuality elements is absolutely right, because they are already used (abused?) ...

Peter Kochmann
11:59 am Task #2306: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Specification

My state of knowledge is as follows:

For INSPIRE spatial dataset and series the conformity statement aims at least...

Peter Kochmann
11:54 am Bug #2322: Interoperability Metadata - CRS

Some input on this.

In the Spatial data Services  TG version 3.1

They mention on page 26 in...

Michael Östling
11:40 am Task #2304: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Category

I wasn't aware that the draft of TG SDS contains details on metadata. I assumed to find functional issues only.
...

Peter Kochmann
11:34 am Task #2305: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Resource locator

I did not follow the discussion about the meaning of accessPoint completely, I want to give a comment on the proposed...

Peter Kochmann

24 Feb 2015

04:16 pm Task #2304: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Category

Am I right to assume that all metadata describing SDS (invocable, interoperable, harmonised) have to fulfil IR Metada...

Peter Kochmann

19 Feb 2015

05:25 pm Task #2304: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Category

Thanks Martin to highlight this point. I passed too fast over the Ine's  comment #7. 

It would be be...

Marc Leobet
02:16 pm Task #2308: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Quality of service

I must say, that I don't have new ideas, but

I would prefer choosing the way, that makes less trouble for user...

Age Sild

17 Feb 2015

09:52 am Task #2221: MIWP-8 (M) Coupled resource

My proposal is only to use xlink:href approach using a unique resource identifier. The unique resource identifier sho...

Pawel Soczewski

16 Feb 2015

11:34 pm Task #2221: MIWP-8 (M) Coupled resource

Hi all, over the last few weeks, I was very busy but now I have carefully read the current discussion and I have the ...

Pawel Soczewski

12 Feb 2015

08:16 am Bug #2324: Interoperability Metadata - Encoding

How do we express that in MD_Format itself there are two mandatory elements (name and version) and one optional (spec...

Peter Kochmann

11 Feb 2015

09:40 am Task #2308: MIWP-8 (J) Metadata for SDS Quality of service

For the  proposal "Use the DQ_DataQuality with DQ_Scope  level with value service", In conformanc...

Ine de Visser

09 Feb 2015

04:12 pm Bug #2325: Interoperability Metadata - Topological Consistency

Topological Consistency

Correctness of the explicitly encoded topological characteristics of the data set as descr...

James Reid
03:56 pm Bug #2325 (Closed): Interoperability Metadata - Topological Consistency

This section has now been locked for editing and a draft version have been moved into the draft document.
See page: ...

James Reid
04:11 pm Bug #2327: Interoperability Metadata - Spatial Representation

2.12.5 Spatial representation type

The method used to spatially represent geographic information.




...

James Reid
03:57 pm Bug #2327 (Closed): Interoperability Metadata - Spatial Representation

This section has now been locked for editing and a draft version have been moved into the draft document.
See page: ...

James Reid
04:10 pm Bug #2326: Interoperability Metadata - Character Encoding


2.12.4 Character Encoding

Full name of the character encoding used for the data set. You must supply th...

James Reid
03:56 pm Bug #2326 (Closed): Interoperability Metadata - Character Encoding

This section has now been locked for editing and a draft version have been moved into the draft document.
See page: ...

James Reid
04:10 pm Bug #2324: Interoperability Metadata - Encoding


2.12.3 Encoding

Description of the computer language construct(s) specifying the representation of data...

James Reid
03:55 pm Bug #2324 (Closed): Interoperability Metadata - Encoding

This section has now been locked for editing and a draft version have been moved into the draft document.
See page: ...

James Reid
04:08 pm Bug #2323: Interoperability Metadata - Temporal Refernce System


2.12.2 Temporal Reference System

Description of the temporal reference system(s) used in the data set.
...

James Reid
03:54 pm Bug #2323 (New): Interoperability Metadata - Temporal Refernce System

James Reid
04:06 pm Bug #2322: Interoperability Metadata - CRS

Cuurent state of play:

 


2.12.1 Coordinate reference system

 

Description of the coo...

James Reid
03:52 pm Bug #2322 (Closed): Interoperability Metadata - CRS

This section has now been locked for editing and a draft version have been moved into the draft document.
See page: ...

James Reid
03:56 pm Task #2220: MIWP-8 (L) Unique Resource Identifier:

Attached a first draft for section 2.2.5 in the TGs.

Martin Seiler
 

Also available in: Atom